[hcflinux] Caller ID not supported?
Linuxant support (Jonathan)
support at linuxant.com
Fri Aug 20 12:54:41 EDT 2004
please try in Windows XP one the same machine to see if Caller ID
feature in Windows XP is correctly working.
Technical specialist / Linuxant
support at linuxant.com
Rick Matthews wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that caller ID is working...
> I don't know if this modem has the required hardware. I can tell you
> every component that's on the board, but I do not have any
> documentation that was delivered with the modem. On the other hand,
> I have gigabytes of documentation from the web, but I can't be positive
> what is applicable and/or accurate.
> AT+VCID=1 produces an OK response, as does AT+VDR=1. I don't consider
> that a guarantee that the required hardware is there, but I'd like to
> think it's at least a good sign. The software is not blindly giving
> responses to everything; AT+FCLASS=8 produces ERROR, and
> consistently, AT+FCLASS=? produces '0'.
> Thanks for the information.
> Steve Laverty wrote::
>>Caller ID has worked flawlessly for me for your application for over a
>>year now. The only thing I can think of is that modems need to have
>>additional hardware to support on-hook caller ID. Perhaps your modem is
>>not equipped. Going into minicom and typing AT+VCID=1 has always worked
>>for me, in fact I combine that with AT+VDR=1 so that I know which 'line'
>>the call came in on. It is worth noting that I beleive that AT+VCID=1
>>only produces a response when not in AT+FCLASS=8. Not sure about 1 or
>>1.0. To be safe try it in 0.
>>Rick Matthews wrote:
>>>My weekend project was to bring up a network caller id sever using a
>>>127a:1003 PCI modem from the spare parts bin and the hcfpcimodem
>>>software (1.01lnxt04072900full_k2.4.20_28.8-1rh.i586 to be exact).
>>>Current status: The modem gives the proper responses during
>>>initialization but reports only the RINGs with no cid information.
>>>I went back through the archives and found:
>>> _Seven people have inquired about caller id.
>>> _Only two of the seven received responses.
>>> _Both were asked to run "hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag".
>>> _Both complied and submitted their dumpdiag data.
>>> _Neither received any additional assistance.
>>> _One of the two then paid for the full version and re-asked
>>> his cid question, but received no response.
>>>Shouldn't caller id be added to the limitations page?
>>>%(real_name)s mailing list
>>%(real_name)s mailing list
> %(real_name)s mailing list
More information about the hcflinux