[hcflinux] Caller ID not supported?

Linuxant support (Jonathan) support at linuxant.com
Fri Aug 20 12:54:41 EDT 2004


please try in Windows XP one the same machine to see if Caller ID 
feature in Windows XP is correctly working.


Technical specialist / Linuxant
support at linuxant.com

Rick Matthews wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that caller ID is working...
> I don't know if this modem has the required hardware.  I can tell you
> every component that's on the board, but I do not have any 
> documentation that was delivered with the modem.  On the other hand, 
> I have gigabytes of documentation from the web, but I can't be positive 
> what is applicable and/or accurate.
> AT+VCID=1 produces an OK response, as does AT+VDR=1.  I don't consider
> that a guarantee that the required hardware is there, but I'd like to
> think it's at least a good sign.  The software is not blindly giving 
> responses to everything; AT+FCLASS=8 produces ERROR, and
> consistently, AT+FCLASS=? produces '0'.
> Thanks for the information.
> Rick
> Steve Laverty wrote::
>>Caller ID has worked flawlessly for me for your application for over a 
>>year now.  The only thing I can think of is that modems need to have 
>>additional hardware to support on-hook caller ID.  Perhaps your modem is 
>>not equipped.  Going into minicom and typing AT+VCID=1 has always worked 
>>for me, in fact I combine that with AT+VDR=1 so that I know which 'line' 
>>the call came in on.  It is worth noting that I beleive that AT+VCID=1 
>>only produces a response when not in AT+FCLASS=8.  Not sure about 1 or 
>>1.0.  To be safe try it in 0.
>>Rick Matthews wrote:
>>>My weekend project was to bring up a network caller id sever using a
>>>127a:1003 PCI modem from the spare parts bin and the hcfpcimodem
>>>software (1.01lnxt04072900full_k2.4.20_28.8-1rh.i586 to be exact).
>>>Current status: The modem gives the proper responses during 
>>>initialization but reports only the RINGs with no cid information.
>>>I went back through the archives and found:
>>>	_Seven people have inquired about caller id.
>>>	_Only two of the seven received responses.
>>>	_Both were asked to run "hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag".
>>>	_Both complied and submitted their dumpdiag data.
>>>	_Neither received any additional assistance.
>>>	_One of the two then paid for the full version and re-asked 
>>>	 his cid question, but received no response.
>>>Shouldn't caller id be added to the limitations page?
>>>%(real_name)s mailing list
>>%(real_name)s mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> %(real_name)s mailing list
> %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

More information about the hcflinux mailing list