[hcflinux] Caller ID not supported?
k5wls at verizon.net
Thu Aug 19 18:21:22 EDT 2004
I'm glad to hear that caller ID is working...
I don't know if this modem has the required hardware. I can tell you
every component that's on the board, but I do not have any
documentation that was delivered with the modem. On the other hand,
I have gigabytes of documentation from the web, but I can't be positive
what is applicable and/or accurate.
AT+VCID=1 produces an OK response, as does AT+VDR=1. I don't consider
that a guarantee that the required hardware is there, but I'd like to
think it's at least a good sign. The software is not blindly giving
responses to everything; AT+FCLASS=8 produces ERROR, and
consistently, AT+FCLASS=? produces '0'.
Thanks for the information.
Steve Laverty wrote::
> Caller ID has worked flawlessly for me for your application for over a
> year now. The only thing I can think of is that modems need to have
> additional hardware to support on-hook caller ID. Perhaps your modem is
> not equipped. Going into minicom and typing AT+VCID=1 has always worked
> for me, in fact I combine that with AT+VDR=1 so that I know which 'line'
> the call came in on. It is worth noting that I beleive that AT+VCID=1
> only produces a response when not in AT+FCLASS=8. Not sure about 1 or
> 1.0. To be safe try it in 0.
> Rick Matthews wrote:
> >My weekend project was to bring up a network caller id sever using a
> >127a:1003 PCI modem from the spare parts bin and the hcfpcimodem
> >software (1.01lnxt04072900full_k2.4.20_28.8-1rh.i586 to be exact).
> >Current status: The modem gives the proper responses during
> >initialization but reports only the RINGs with no cid information.
> >I went back through the archives and found:
> > _Seven people have inquired about caller id.
> > _Only two of the seven received responses.
> > _Both were asked to run "hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag".
> > _Both complied and submitted their dumpdiag data.
> > _Neither received any additional assistance.
> > _One of the two then paid for the full version and re-asked
> > his cid question, but received no response.
> >Shouldn't caller id be added to the limitations page?
> >%(real_name)s mailing list
> %(real_name)s mailing list
More information about the hcflinux